1 of 11
3 years ago
Sat Jul 03, 2021 2:27 am
BrutalBodyShots
Senior AdministratorGoodwill Saturation Technique Author
BrutalBodyShots has been gardening for over 2 years.
BrutalBodyShots has achieved the Garden Goal !!
BrutalBodyShots has achieved the Garden Goal !!
EDIT: Last updated 6/17/23
Credit Karma is a very popular CMS that almost everyone seems to know about these days thanks to television commercials, radio spots and other advertising. Typing any number of credit-related phrases into a search engine such as "fix my credit" or "credit score" will almost always return a first-page result for Credit Karma.
Most people when they sign up for Credit Karma have very limited knowledge of how credit works. As a result, they are very easily influenced or even manipulated by what they are presented. Many individuals that find this site will be new to credit, a point validated by the fact that they're reading this in the "Credit for Beginners" section.
I wanted to share what I believe to be the good and the bad of Credit Karma. I feel everyone should only focus on the good, while understanding why the bad is in fact bad and should be ignored. Let's start with the good:
- It's free!
- Daily updates to your TransUnion credit report.
- Updates to your Equifax credit report at least weekly, often more frequent than that.
- Credit report monitoring for TU / EQ.
- Resources such as dispute filing, different calculators, unclaimed money, articles to read, etc.
- The score(s) you are provided are not Fico scores! They are from the VantageScore 3.0 model and are rarely used in lending decisions.
- Products pushed such as loans and credit cards are there for Credit Karma to make money. Don't be manipulated by their "approval odds" or targeted offers.
- Ignore the front-end "fluff" from Credit Karma. Each section on scoring criteria comes with a color-coded display with your usual green/good, yellow/fair and red/poor ratings. From a Fico scoring perspective, which is all you need to worry about when it comes to lending decisions, each and every one of these sections is misleading. I'll take you through each one by one and explain:
- Payment history: When it comes to on-time payments, there's really only two categories. You've either never missed a payment (good) or you have (bad). All it takes is 1 missed payment to severely impact your Fico scores. The image below from Credit Karma however shows green for both 99% and 100% of payments made on time, suggestive that something less than 100% is still "good." I can assure you that even 1 missed payment is bad!
- Derogatory Marks: Just like payment history above, when it comes to derogatory marks having just 1 is bad. The image below from Credit Karma suggests that 1 only puts someone into the yellow and isn't poor, when a single derogatory item can crush Fico scores.
- Credit Age, or age of accounts is an important Fico scoring factor. The Credit Karma image below shows average age of open accounts, which is not how the Fico or VS algorithms work. They look at both open and closed accounts, as they count equally when it comes to age factors. Second, the image you see suggests that having an average age of accounts of less than 2 years or 2-4 years are equally poor, as both are shown as red. An average age of accounts under Fico scoring of 1 year verses 3 years is significantly different and would in no way be viewed as the same.
- Inquiries: Credit Karma's graphic suggests that 0 inquiries is no better than 1-2 inquiries, as both are color-coded green. Moving from 0 inquiries to 1-2 inquiries depending on Fico scoring model could result in anything from a small score drop to a moderate one, so we can't consider them to be equally good.
- Total accounts: This summary image from Credit Karma just makes me angry. It is suggestive that anywhere from 0-10 accounts on your credit report would be bad, where 11-20 accounts would be good. From a Fico scoring standpoint, this is just terrible information. An important segmentation factor for Fico scorecards relates to file thickness. A thick file is better than a thin file. While the exact point of thick vs thin may not be known, we have a fairly good idea. For example, someone with only 2 accounts has a thin file, where someone with 7 accounts has a thick file. Under no Fico scoring circumstance would the 2 account file be considered an equal to the 7 account file, all other things being the same.
- Utilization: The Credit Karma graphic suggests that reported utilization anywhere in the 0%-29% range is equally good. We know for Fico scoring that this is not the case and that overall utilization of a low single-digit percentage is going to return a higher Fico score than a double-digit overall utilization percentage. We also know that there's a Fico scoring penalty for "no revolving credit use" when $0 of utilization is reported across all accounts (that is, not a single non-zero reported balance).
- Simulator: Credit Karma has a score simulator just like many CMS provide. Simulators are notoriously unreliable, so it's best to ignore them. This isn't unique to just Credit Karma and their simulator isn't any "worse" than any other... I just say steer clear of them all for anything other than entertainment purposes. With the proper information provided, the members of this forum can give predictions that will make any simulator out there go cry in the corner.
- Tagline Goodwill Saturation Technique Author
- Classic 8 Scorecard CLEAN/THICK/MATURE/NO-NEW-REVOLVER
- Mortgage Scorecard CLEAN/THICK/MATURE/NO-NEW-ACCOUNT
- AoOA 266 months
- AoORA 266 months
- Date of Last Inquiry and/or New Account Opening May 23rd, 2022
- Garden Goal 24