So, I accidentally conducted a utilization experiment this month, and I was a little surprised at the results! I think we all agree that the scoring effects of certain factors are minimized on a dirty scorecard, but I didn't think it would be this noticeable. What happened: My CapOne Savor One statement closed a few days earlier than usual this month (February only has 28 days is my guess as to why). I did not pay the balance to $0 as usual before it closed, and it closed with a balance of $1030 vs a $2250 CL (46% individual utilization). So, before the new balance reported, my utilization stats were as follows: 9 open accounts (8 revolvers and 1 installment) with 2 AWB (22% AWB). Aggregate revolving utilization: $1885 reported balance of a $20950 TCL (9% utilization). Utilization stats after the new balance reported: 9 open accounts (8 revolvers and 1 installment) with 3 AWB (33% AWB) Aggregate revolving utilization: $2915 reported balance of a $20950 TCL (14% utilization) The results?!? FICO 8.png No score loss on EQ8 or EX8, and a 1 point score loss on TU8! Now, I know I didn't smash through any crazy utilization thresholds here, but going from 9% (under 9.5%, so no round up) aggregate revolving to 14% crossed a known scoring threshold, and going from 0% to 46% individual utilization on that 1 card crosses several known scoring thresholds, yet almost no score loss occurred for me. It's also worth exploring that TU specifically refers to the balance of this card as a 'bankcard' where the others do not. We already know TU handles bankcards a little differently, but it's interesting to see they were the only ones who penalized me at all for the utilization changes. Alerts.png Anyway, I was expecting a bigger score loss when I realized this had happened, but there are the results. Thoughts?
Post

Utilization Scoring Minimalized on a Dirty Scorecard? (FICO 8)

1 of 7
3 years ago
Wed Feb 23, 2022 4:40 pm
User avatar
SoonerSoldier33
Seasoned RebelTeam Cash Back
Level9 Last INQMonday, November 27, 2023 Gardening For9 months, 20 days, 13 hours, and 38 minutes Next Level in10 days, 10 hours, and 22 minutes on September 27th INQ 1yr onWednesday, November 27, 2024 INQ 1yr in2 months, 10 days, 10 hours, and 22 minutes INQ 2yr onThursday, November 27, 2025 INQ 2yr in1 year, 2 months, 10 days, 10 hours, and 22 minutes Goal24 months Goal DateThursday, November 27, 2025 Goal In1 year, 2 months, 10 days, 10 hours, and 22 minutes
So, I accidentally conducted a utilization experiment this month, and I was a little surprised at the results! I think we all agree that the scoring effects of certain factors are minimized on a dirty scorecard, but I didn't think it would be this noticeable. What happened: My CapOne Savor One statement closed a few days earlier than usual this month (February only has 28 days is my guess as to why). I did not pay the balance to $0 as usual before it closed, and it closed with a balance of $1030 vs a $2250 CL (46% individual utilization). So, before the new balance reported, my utilization stats were as follows: 9 open accounts (8 revolvers and 1 installment) with 2 AWB (22% AWB). Aggregate revolving utilization: $1885 reported balance of a $20950 TCL (9% utilization). Utilization stats after the new balance reported: 9 open accounts (8 revolvers and 1 installment) with 3 AWB (33% AWB) Aggregate revolving utilization: $2915 reported balance of a $20950 TCL (14% utilization) The results?!?
FICO 8.png 41.99 KiB Viewed 95 times
No score loss on EQ8 or EX8, and a 1 point score loss on TU8! Now, I know I didn't smash through any crazy utilization thresholds here, but going from 9% (under 9.5%, so no round up) aggregate revolving to 14% crossed a known scoring threshold, and going from 0% to 46% individual utilization on that 1 card crosses several known scoring thresholds, yet almost no score loss occurred for me. It's also worth exploring that TU specifically refers to the balance of this card as a 'bankcard' where the others do not. We already know TU handles bankcards a little differently, but it's interesting to see they were the only ones who penalized me at all for the utilization changes.
Alerts.png 49.55 KiB Viewed 95 times
Anyway, I was expecting a bigger score loss when I realized this had happened, but there are the results. Thoughts?
SoonerSoldier33
User avatar
  • Score data TU FICO 8: 641 EQ FICO 8: 616 EX FICO 8: 649
1
Post

Re: Utilization Scoring Minimalized on a Dirty Scorecard? (FICO 8)

2 of 7
3 years ago
Wed Feb 23, 2022 5:16 pm
User avatar
BrutalBodyShots
Senior AdministratorGoodwill Saturation Technique Author
BrutalBodyShots has been gardening for over 2 years.
BrutalBodyShots has achieved the Garden Goal !!
Level27 Last INQMonday, May 23, 2022 Gardening For2 years, 3 months, 24 days, 13 hours, and 38 minutes Next Level in6 days, 10 hours, and 22 minutes on September 23rd INQ 1yr onTuesday, May 23, 2023 INQ 1yr reached1 year, 3 months, 24 days, 13 hours, and 38 minutes ago INQ 2yr onThursday, May 23, 2024 INQ 2yr reached3 months, 24 days, 13 hours, and 38 minutes ago Goal24 months Goal DateThursday, May 23, 2024 Goal Achieved3 months, 24 days, 13 hours, and 38 minutes ago
I think your assessment that your dirty scorecard is nullifying the losses is correct. On a clean scorecard I'd imagine that there would be some pretty noticeable losses. Crossing the first known aggregate utilization threshold would definitely result in some losses, probably around 10 points give or take.

One question. You referenced that Capital One card moving to 46% reported individual utilization. Prior to that card reporting, what was your previous revolver highest utilization percentage? There's a chance that you moved across a threshold here before/after as well, something that again I think would have resulted in greater losses on a clean scorecard.

Good information with your unplanned test!
BrutalBodyShots
User avatar
1
Post

Re: Utilization Scoring Minimalized on a Dirty Scorecard? (FICO 8)

3 of 7
3 years ago
Wed Feb 23, 2022 5:41 pm
User avatar
SoonerSoldier33
Seasoned RebelTeam Cash Back
Level9 Last INQMonday, November 27, 2023 Gardening For9 months, 20 days, 13 hours, and 38 minutes Next Level in10 days, 10 hours, and 22 minutes on September 27th INQ 1yr onWednesday, November 27, 2024 INQ 1yr in2 months, 10 days, 10 hours, and 22 minutes INQ 2yr onThursday, November 27, 2025 INQ 2yr in1 year, 2 months, 10 days, 10 hours, and 22 minutes Goal24 months Goal DateThursday, November 27, 2025 Goal In1 year, 2 months, 10 days, 10 hours, and 22 minutes
BrutalBodyShots wrote: Wed Feb 23, 2022 5:16 pm I think your assessment that your dirty scorecard is nullifying the losses is correct. On a clean scorecard I'd imagine that there would be some pretty noticeable losses. Crossing the first known aggregate utilization threshold would definitely result in some losses, probably around 10 points give or take. One question. You referenced that Capital One card moving to 46% reported individual utilization. Prior to that card reporting, what was your previous revolver highest utilization percentage? There's a chance that you moved across a threshold here before/after as well, something that again I think would have resulted in greater losses on a clean scorecard. Good information with your unplanned test!
Good point about the individual utilization threshold. Previously, I only had a reported balance on 1 card...my Discover with a reported balance of $1885 against a $7K CL for 27% individual utilization. All my other revolvers report a $0 balance. So, I went from previous high individual utilization of 27% up to 46% along with the aggregate increase, and almost no score loss.
SoonerSoldier33
User avatar
  • Score data TU FICO 8: 641 EQ FICO 8: 616 EX FICO 8: 649
1
Post

Re: Utilization Scoring Minimalized on a Dirty Scorecard? (FICO 8)

4 of 7
3 years ago
Wed Feb 23, 2022 5:49 pm
User avatar
BrutalBodyShots
Senior AdministratorGoodwill Saturation Technique Author
BrutalBodyShots has been gardening for over 2 years.
BrutalBodyShots has achieved the Garden Goal !!
Level27 Last INQMonday, May 23, 2022 Gardening For2 years, 3 months, 24 days, 13 hours, and 38 minutes Next Level in6 days, 10 hours, and 22 minutes on September 23rd INQ 1yr onTuesday, May 23, 2023 INQ 1yr reached1 year, 3 months, 24 days, 13 hours, and 38 minutes ago INQ 2yr onThursday, May 23, 2024 INQ 2yr reached3 months, 24 days, 13 hours, and 38 minutes ago Goal24 months Goal DateThursday, May 23, 2024 Goal Achieved3 months, 24 days, 13 hours, and 38 minutes ago
Yeah you actually had 4 factors increase near as I can tell:

1 - Aggregate utilization threshold crossed
2 - Individual utilization threshold crossed
3 - Reported revolving balance (dollars) increased
4 - AWB increased (+1)

I wouldn't expect factors 3 or 4 to adversely impact your score, but they are factors that could on another file. It is surprising to me that 1 and 2 didn't impact you at least a bit more. This is good information though for those on a dirty scorecard.
BrutalBodyShots
User avatar
1
Post

Re: Utilization Scoring Minimalized on a Dirty Scorecard? (FICO 8)

5 of 7
3 years ago
Sat Feb 26, 2022 4:08 am
User avatar
Birdman
Primer AuthorCo-Founder
Birdman has been gardening for over 2 years.
Level30 Last INQWednesday, March 2, 2022 Gardening For2 years, 6 months, 14 days, 13 hours, and 38 minutes Next Level in15 days, 10 hours, and 22 minutes on October 2nd INQ 1yr onThursday, March 2, 2023 INQ 1yr reached1 year, 6 months, 14 days, 13 hours, and 38 minutes ago INQ 2yr onSaturday, March 2, 2024 INQ 2yr reached6 months, 14 days, 13 hours, and 38 minutes ago
Utilization should be weighted more heavily on a dirty card. However you have a lot of things optimized and you only crossed one aggregate and one individual threshold utilizationwise. The only thing I can think is due to other factors being optimized you weren’t penalized much.
Birdman
User avatar
  • Score data EQ8-827; TU8-817; EX8-816
    EQ5-751; TI4- 800; EX2-814
0
Post

Re: Utilization Scoring Minimalized on a Dirty Scorecard? (FICO 8)

6 of 7
3 years ago
Sat Feb 26, 2022 10:30 am
User avatar
BrutalBodyShots
Senior AdministratorGoodwill Saturation Technique Author
BrutalBodyShots has been gardening for over 2 years.
BrutalBodyShots has achieved the Garden Goal !!
Level27 Last INQMonday, May 23, 2022 Gardening For2 years, 3 months, 24 days, 13 hours, and 38 minutes Next Level in6 days, 10 hours, and 22 minutes on September 23rd INQ 1yr onTuesday, May 23, 2023 INQ 1yr reached1 year, 3 months, 24 days, 13 hours, and 38 minutes ago INQ 2yr onThursday, May 23, 2024 INQ 2yr reached3 months, 24 days, 13 hours, and 38 minutes ago Goal24 months Goal DateThursday, May 23, 2024 Goal Achieved3 months, 24 days, 13 hours, and 38 minutes ago
Birdman wrote: Sat Feb 26, 2022 4:08 am Utilization should be weighted more heavily on a dirty card. However you have a lot of things optimized and you only crossed one aggregate and one individual threshold utilizationwise. The only thing I can think is due to other factors being optimized you weren’t penalized much.
Yeah? I always thought it was the opposite. With utilization being a bigger deal on a dirty score card I would think fairly strong (at least noticeable) score changes would have happened. I know if the same changes were made on my clean scorecard I would have seen score movement.
BrutalBodyShots
User avatar
0
Post

Re: Utilization Scoring Minimalized on a Dirty Scorecard? (FICO 8)

7 of 7
3 years ago
Sat Feb 26, 2022 3:04 pm
User avatar
Birdman
Primer AuthorCo-Founder
Birdman has been gardening for over 2 years.
Level30 Last INQWednesday, March 2, 2022 Gardening For2 years, 6 months, 14 days, 13 hours, and 38 minutes Next Level in15 days, 10 hours, and 22 minutes on October 2nd INQ 1yr onThursday, March 2, 2023 INQ 1yr reached1 year, 6 months, 14 days, 13 hours, and 38 minutes ago INQ 2yr onSaturday, March 2, 2024 INQ 2yr reached6 months, 14 days, 13 hours, and 38 minutes ago
BrutalBodyShots wrote: Sat Feb 26, 2022 10:30 am
Birdman wrote: Sat Feb 26, 2022 4:08 am Utilization should be weighted more heavily on a dirty card. However you have a lot of things optimized and you only crossed one aggregate and one individual threshold utilizationwise. The only thing I can think is due to other factors being optimized you weren’t penalized much.
Yeah? I always thought it was the opposite. With utilization being a bigger deal on a dirty score card I would think fairly strong (at least noticeable) score changes would have happened. I know if the same changes were made on my clean scorecard I would have seen score movement.
I believe it all depends on what’s in the profile, remember categories have maximum point allocations I believe as well as the overall score. Either way go to the Primer and look at the example scorecard from fico, it demonstrates Utilization is weighted more heavily on dirty cards. With that being said there are multiple dirty cards and there could be variations among them.
Birdman
User avatar
  • Score data EQ8-827; TU8-817; EX8-816
    EQ5-751; TI4- 800; EX2-814
0
Processing